Which scoring system is effective in predicting mortality in patients with Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever? A validation study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBarkay, Orcun/0000-0001-5347-7740
dc.authoridOz, Murtaza/0000-0003-3415-5927
dc.contributor.authorBakir, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authoroksuz, Caner
dc.contributor.authorKarakecili, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorBaykam, Nurcan
dc.contributor.authorBarut, Sener
dc.contributor.authorBuyuktuna, Seyit Ali
dc.contributor.authorozkurt, Zulal
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:11:17Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:11:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to decide which scoring system is the best for the evaluation of the course of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) by comparing scoring systems such as qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) and SGS (Severity Grading System) in centers where patients with CCHF were monitored. The study was conducted with patients diagnosed with CCHF in five different centers where the disease was encountered most commonly. Patients having proven PCR and/or IgM positivity for CCHF were included in the study. The scores of the scoring systems on admission, at the 72(nd) hour and at the 120(th) hour were calculated and evaluated. The data of 388 patients were obtained from five centers and evaluated. SGS, SOFA and APACHE II were the best scoring systems in predicting mortality on admission. All scoring systems were significant in predicting mortality at the 72(nd) and 120(th) hours. On admission, there was a correlation between the qSOFA, SOFA and APACHE II scores and the SGS scores in the group of survivors. All scoring systems had a positive correlation in the same direction. The correlation coefficients were strong for qSOFA and SOFA, but poor for APACHE II. A one-unit rise in SGS increased the probability of death by 12.818 times. qSOFA did not provide significant results in predicting mortality on admission. SGS, SOFA and APACHE II performed best at admission and at the 72(nd) and 120(th) hours.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/20477724.2021.2012921
dc.identifier.endpage200
dc.identifier.issn2047-7724
dc.identifier.issn2047-7732
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid34866547
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121287529
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage193
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2021.2012921
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/30593
dc.identifier.volume116
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000727170100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofPathogens and Global Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAPACHE II
dc.subjectCrimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever
dc.subjectqSOFA
dc.subjectSGS
dc.subjectSOFA
dc.titleWhich scoring system is effective in predicting mortality in patients with Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever? A validation study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu