Comparison of Bond Strength of Soft Denture Liner on the Denture Base Materials Produced by Different Methods and Effect of Thermocycling

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKoyu, Tugce/0000-0002-2235-7540
dc.contributor.authorTugut, Faik
dc.contributor.authorKoyu, Tugce
dc.contributor.authorTurkyilmaz, Orhun
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-04T16:46:03Z
dc.date.available2025-05-04T16:46:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAim: This study set out to determine the tensile bond strength between denture bases (produced by 3D printing technology, conventional technique, and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing [CAD/CAM] milled) and silicone-based soft lining material. The consequence of thermocycling on the bonding strength was also investigated. Materials and Methods: The bonding between denture foundation materials produced through three distinct techniques (conventional, CAD/CAM milled, and 3D printed) and silicone-based soft lining material was examined. Before tensile testing, half of the samples underwent thermocycling (5-55 degrees C, 5,000 cycles) in 37 degrees C distilled water for 48 hours. A universal testing apparatus employed a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The failure type was identified visually, and the maximum tensile strength was noted. The Shapiro-Wilk test and analysis of variances (P = .05) were used to assess the statistics. Results: CAD/CAM milled denture base material (1.56 +/- 0.62/1.36 +/- 0.16 MPa) showed higher bond strength values than the other denture bases in the tensile test conducted before and after thermocycling (P < .001). The denture base material made conventionally had the lowest bond strength (1.02 +/- 0.24/0.77 +/- 0.1 MPa) (P < .001). The tensile bond strength values of the conventional and 3D printing groups showed a statistically significant drop before and after thermocycling (P = .001). Regardless of thermocycling, adhesive failure was primarily seen in all groups (76.6%). Conclusion: Compared to conventionally produced denture bases, the bond strength of soft relining materials to CAD/CAM milled and 3D printed denture base is different. In denture base materials that are conventionally, CAD/CAM and 3D printed, the thermocycling method reduced bonding strength values.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/23202068241269854
dc.identifier.endpage130
dc.identifier.issn2320-2068
dc.identifier.issn2320-2076
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207312256
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage124
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/23202068241269854
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/35319
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001335687600006
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage Publications India Pvt Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Oral Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250504
dc.subjectCAD/CAM
dc.subject3D printing
dc.subjectSoft denture liner
dc.subjectPolymethylmethacrylate
dc.titleComparison of Bond Strength of Soft Denture Liner on the Denture Base Materials Produced by Different Methods and Effect of Thermocycling
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu