Tensile bond strength of soft and hard relining materials to conventional and additively manufactured denture-base materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAkin, Hakan/0000-0002-4770-4297
dc.authoridKoseoglu, Merve/0000-0001-9110-9586
dc.contributor.authorKoseoglu, Merve
dc.contributor.authorTugut, Faik
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:07:43Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose Studies comparing tensile bond strength of various soft and hard denture liner materials to conventionally and additively manufactured denture base resins are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tensile bond strength between chair- and laboratory-side soft and hard relining materials and denture-base materials produced by additive manufacturing and conventional methods. Materials and methods A total of 120 dimethacrylate-based additively manufactured and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-based conventionally fabricated dumbbell-shaped denture-base resins were produced. Heat-cured laboratory-side soft reline material, self-cured chair-side soft reline material, and self-cured chair-side hard reline material were attached to the denture bases. The tensile force was applied to the specimens with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The obtained data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. The significance level was set at alpha = 0.05. Results The highest tensile bond strength values were obtained in the specimens from the conventionally manufactured base and self-cured chair-side hard reline material group, and the lowest was seen in the additively fabricated base and self-cured chair-side soft reline material group (p < 0.001). Conventionally manufactured base material's tensile bond strength was higher than that of additively fabricated resin, and self-cured chair-side hard reline material's strength was higher than that of laboratory-side and chair-side soft reline materials (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference emerged between laboratory-side and chair-side soft reline materials (p = 0.405). Conclusions All the specimens used in the present study had tensile bonding stress values for clinical use. Both denture base resins provided an increased bond to the chair-side hard relining material, although an improved bond did not emerge for the chair-side and laboratory-side soft denture reline materials.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13608
dc.identifier.endpage80
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.pmid36111532
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85139092218
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage74
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13608
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/29654
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000864203400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject3D printed dentures
dc.subjectadditive manufacturing
dc.subjectdenture base
dc.subjectdenture liner
dc.titleTensile bond strength of soft and hard relining materials to conventional and additively manufactured denture-base materials
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu