Difficulties Regarding the Requirement of Indicating the Reason for Appeal in Criminal Procedural Law

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBirtek, Fatih/0000-0001-7019-0653
dc.contributor.authorBirtek, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:00:40Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:00:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe Turkish Court of Cassation began functioning on July 20, 2016. With this legal step, the Turkish Criminal Procedures (TCP) system transformed into a three-tier criminal justice system. First-and second-degree criminal procedures involve two aspects of judicial review: point of law and point of proof. However, the scope of judicial review of Turkish Court of Cassation includes only reviews points of law. The Court of Cassation only rules on the issue of point of law in material cases. The rules pertaining to the obligations for reason submittal and ultra petita have been adopted with regard to remedying legal appeals in the Turkish Criminal Procedure Code (TCPC). Therefore, the appeal must be made in a way that includes the whole reasons and also appellant can submit an additional petition which includes reasons of appeal. Although an application may be accepted as a request of appeal without showing a certain reason for the request, it cannot be accepted strictly as an appeal application. Therefore, the recent practices of the Court of Cassation have not been within the letter of the law.This study provides a detailed discussion of the characteristics of an appeal request, their importance in terms of the freedom of access to justice and the right to a fair trial, the obligation to indication the reasons for appeal in the appellate brief, the deadline for indicating reasons, and the legal results related to neglecting these requirements in line with theory and practice.
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/mecmua.2022.80.4.0008
dc.identifier.endpage1372
dc.identifier.issn2636-7734
dc.identifier.issn2667-6974
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage1331
dc.identifier.trdizinid1166240
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2022.80.4.0008
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1166240
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/27790
dc.identifier.volume80
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000992616100007
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ, Fac Law
dc.relation.ispartofIstanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectRight of Access To Justice
dc.subjectAppellate
dc.subjectAppellate Brief
dc.subjectIndicating The Reason of Appeal
dc.subjectRejection of Appeal
dc.titleDifficulties Regarding the Requirement of Indicating the Reason for Appeal in Criminal Procedural Law
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu