Microperc Versus Miniperc for Treatment of Renal Stones Smaller Than 2 cm in Pediatric Patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDundar, Gokce
dc.contributor.authorGokce, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorGokcen, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorKorgali, Esat
dc.contributor.authorAsdemir, Aydemir
dc.contributor.authorKaygusuz, Kenan
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T09:44:52Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T09:44:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.department[Dundar, Gokce -- Gokce, Gokhan -- Gokcen, Kaan -- Korgali, Esat -- Asdemir, Aydemir] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, Sivas, Turkey -- [Kaygusuz, Kenan] Cumhuriyet Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Fac Med, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Pediatric stone disease is an important clinical problem in pediatric urology practice. We aimed to compare mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniperc) and micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) in pediatric patients who underwent unsuccesful SWL procedure. Materials and methods: A number of 43 pediatric patients, aged 17 years or younger, were treated with miniperc or microperc procedures due to renal calculi by a single surgeon. In group 1, there were 27 patients who underwent miniperc procedure. In group 2, 16 patients were treated by microperc. Results: Mean age of the patients were 9.5 (3-17) years in group 1 and 7.9 (2-16) years in group 2 (P = .25). Stone burden was similar between the two groups. Mean operation duration was 74.1 (40-110) minutes in miniperc group and 37.2 (20-55) minutes in microperc group (P < .01). Patients who underwent microperc were discharged from clinic earlier. Hyperthermia without bacteraemia was observed in 2 children in the miniperc group and was treated by using a single dose of paracetamol and also 2 children in the same group needed blood transfusion. There was a tendency for low haemoglobin decrease in microperc group compared to miniperc (P > .05). Conclusion: The management of pediatric stone disease has evolved with improvements in techniques and minimalisation of surgical instruments and thus, it can be effectively and safely used in children by experienced surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2832en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27734423en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994130628en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage2829en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/7197
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000388158300003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUROL & NEPHROL RES CTR-UNRCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUROLOGY JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectmicropercen_US
dc.subjectminipercen_US
dc.subjectnephrolithiasisen_US
dc.subjectpediatricen_US
dc.subjectpercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.titleMicroperc Versus Miniperc for Treatment of Renal Stones Smaller Than 2 cm in Pediatric Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu