Effects of hormone receptor status on patient clinic and survival in HER2 positive breast cancer

dc.authoridYILMAZ, MUKADDES/0000-0002-7927-8480
dc.authoridUCAR, MAHMUT/0000-0002-3311-6152
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Mukaddes
dc.contributor.authorErdis, Eda
dc.contributor.authorUcar, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Necla
dc.contributor.authorAlandag, Celal
dc.contributor.authorYucel, Birsen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:09:00Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:09:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground In the current study, the effect of hormone receptor (HR) status on clinical and survival in early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer was investigated. Methods Two hundred ninety-one patients with HER2- positive were examined in two categories as HR-positive and HR-negative. Results Of these, 197 (68%) were HR-positive and 94 (32%) were HR-negative with a mean follow-up period of 68 +/- 2.7 months. The groups were found to be similar in terms of age, menopausal status, comorbidity, pathologic type, stage, T stage, N stage, lymphovascular invasion, presence and percentage of intraductal component, multicentricity/focality and extracapsular invasion. Family history (P = 0.038), stage 2 tumor rate (P < 0.001), and perineural invasion (P = 0.005) were significantly higher in the HR-positive group. In the HR-negative group, mean Ki-67 value (P = 0.014), stage 3 tumor rate (P < 0.001), tumor necrosis (P = 0.004) and strong (3+) HER2 staining on immunohistochemical staining (P = 0.003) were higher. The incidence of relapse and metastasis, and the localization of metastasis were similar in both patient groups. The rate of locoregional relapse during the first 2 years was higher in the HR-negative patients than in the HR-positive patients (P = 0.023). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ between the groups in univariate analysis. However, HR status was determined as an independent prognostic factor (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17-3.79; P = 0.012) for OS was not found to be significant for DFS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Both clinicopathologic features and OS outcomes of HR-negative patients were worse than those of HR-positive patients.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjco/hyae010
dc.identifier.endpage529
dc.identifier.issn0368-2811
dc.identifier.issn1465-3621
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.pmid38336481
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192681853
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage521
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/29889
dc.identifier.volume54
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001160950900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press
dc.relation.ispartofJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectbreast cancer
dc.subjectHER2
dc.subjecthormone receptor
dc.subjectsurvival
dc.subjectclinical features
dc.titleEffects of hormone receptor status on patient clinic and survival in HER2 positive breast cancer
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar