Assessment of Alveolar Bone Levels from Bitewing, Periapical and Panoramic Radiographs in Periodontitis Patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorGedik, R.
dc.contributor.authorMarakoglu, I.
dc.contributor.authorDemirer, S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:15:03Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:15:03Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.department[Gedik, R.] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Diag & Radiol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkey -- [Marakoglu, I. -- Demirer, S.] Cumhuriyet Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, TR-58140 Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the relationship between loss of radiographic crestal bone height in panoramic, bitewing and periapical radiography and to probe the attachment loss after periodontal treatment. Radiographic and probing measurements were made at baseline and after one year. The population in the study consisted of 21 individuals, 13 females and 8 males, ages 18-59 [mean 35.7] years. A total of 42 interproximal intra-bony defects of 21 mandibular first molar teeth, treatments of which were planned by subgingival curettage procedures, were selected from among 21 subjects who had signed consent forms. Measurements of the distance between the cemento-enamel junction and the alveolar crest were compared with probing crestal bone level and radiographic measurements before and one year after the procedures. The results of probing pocket depths level before and one year after subgingival curettage were different with the mean average being 1.18. +/- 1.51 mm. These changes were statistically significant (p < 0. 05). Bitewing radiography showed the highest accuracy among radiographic methods in the assessment of the crestal bone level mean average 0.22 +/- 0.87 mm (p < 0. 05). There was only a slight mean difference compared to panoramic radiography but this was statistically insignificant, mean average 0.20 +/- 1.35 mm (p > 0. 05), and the periapical radiography had the lowest accuracy of radiographic methods, changed mean average -0.14 +/- 1.19.mm (p > 0. 05). In summary, we can say that both bitewing and panoramic radiography are preferred to periapical images for crestal bone assesment.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage413en_US
dc.identifier.issn0043-3144
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19566026en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-58149095536en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10328
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000262447900019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUNIV WEST INDIES FACULTY MEDICAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNALen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleAssessment of Alveolar Bone Levels from Bitewing, Periapical and Panoramic Radiographs in Periodontitis Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu