Comparison of photoscreeners and hand-held autorefractometer with cycloplegic autorefractometry in children with newly diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYeter, Duygu Yalınbaş
dc.contributor.authorBozali, Erman
dc.contributor.authorKara, Caner
dc.contributor.authorSarı, Seda Aybüke
dc.contributor.authorDursun, Demet
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T17:51:25Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T17:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare non-cycloplegic refraction measurements of two photoscreeners and the hand-held autorefractometer with cycloplegic measurements of the autorefractometer in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Meterials and methods: This cross-sectional, comparative study consisted of 53 children who were newly diagnosed with ADHD. We compared spherical, cylindrical, cylindrical axis and spherical equivalent (SE) measurements in Plusoptix A12, Spot Vision Screener, and Retinomax K-plus Screen with Tonoref II. Reliability was analyzed by using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between devices. Results: The mean age of children was 9.45±1.68. All of the devices measured spherical power and SE significantly more myopic than the Tonoref II. While The Spot Vision Screener, PlusoptiX A12, and Tonoref II provided similar cylindrical power, Retinomax K-plus Screen measured significantly lower than the Tonoref II. The excellent reliability was detected in spherical power, cylindrical power, SE and J0 between Tonoref II and PlusoptiX A12 (ICC:0.930, 0.921, 0.927 and 0.920, respectively. All of the hand-held devices showed excellent reliability in terms of cylindrical power and J0 (ICC>0.90, for all) and good reliability for J45 (ICC:0.75-0.90 for all). Conclusion: Despite all devices having advantages or disadvantages, Plusoptix A12 showed excellent reliability for detecting refractive errors in children with ADHD. © 2023, Pamukkale University. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.31362/patd.1140073
dc.identifier.endpage207
dc.identifier.issn1309-9833
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85160685551
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage196
dc.identifier.trdizinid1163656
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31362/patd.1140073
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1163656
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/26211
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPamukkale University
dc.relation.ispartofPamukkale Medical Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder; autorefractometer; children; cycloplegia; photoscreener
dc.titleComparison of photoscreeners and hand-held autorefractometer with cycloplegic autorefractometry in children with newly diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
dc.title.alternativeYeni tanı konmuş dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğu olan çocuklarda fotoscreener ve el tipi otorefraktometrenin sikloplejik otorefraktometri ile karşılaştırılması
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu