Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques

dc.authoridEr, Kursat -- 0000-0002-0667-4909en_US
dc.contributor.authorKustarci, Alper
dc.contributor.authorAkpinar, Kerem Engin
dc.contributor.authorEr, Kuersat
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-28T10:15:36Z
dc.date.available2019-07-27T12:10:23Z
dc.date.available2019-07-28T10:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.department[Er, Kuersat] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey -- [Kustarci, Alper -- Akpinar, Kerem Engin] Cumhuriyet Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Sivas, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The purpose of this study was to compare in vitro the amount of debris and irrigant extruded apically from extracted teeth, using manual technique and crowndown pressureless technique by K3, RaCe, and FlexMaster instruments. Study design. Sixty human single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups, 15 teeth each. The teeth in 4 groups were instrumented until the working length with RaCe, K3, FlexMaster, and K-type stainless steel instruments respectively. Debris and irrigant extruded from the apical foramen were collected into vials and the amounts were determined. The data obtained were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests, with alpha=0.05 as the level for statistical significance. Results. No statistically significant difference was observed among the groups in terms of debris extrusion ( P >.05). On the other hand, a statistically significant difference was observed between K3 and manual technique groups in terms of irrigant extrusion ( P >.05). The difference between other groups was not statistically significant ( P >.05). Conclusion. Based on the results, all instrumentation techniques produced extruded debris and irrigant; however, the engine-driven nickel-titanium systems were associated with less apical extrusion and irrigant.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.028en_US
dc.identifier.endpage262en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104
dc.identifier.issn1528-395X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18230395en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-38949089711en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage257en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/10437
dc.identifier.volume105en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000253132200023en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleApical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar