Comparison of push-out bond strength and apical microleakage of different calcium silicate-based cements after using EDTA, chitosan and phytic acid irrigations

dc.authoridUNAL, MURAT/0000-0002-0925-4328
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Tutku Kocak
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:03:54Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:03:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis research was aimed to evaluate push-out bond strength and apical-microleakage after application of three different calcium silicate-based cements with irrigation solutions on simulated immature teeth. 40 maxillary permanent canine teeth were used for push-out bond strength test, and 120 maxillary permanent incisors were used for microleakage evaluation. 120 root slices were divided into four main groups (EDTA, Chitosan, Phytic acid, and Saline) and immersed these solutiouns according to irrigation procedures. Each irrigation group was divided into 3 subgroups (Biodentine, MTA Repair HP, and NeoPUTTY). The prepared teeth were divided into four groups according to irrigation procedure for microleakage test. EDTA irrigation with Biodentine group showed highest push-out bond strength value and saline group with Neoputty showed the lowest push-out bond strength value. The highest microleakage value was seen in saline group with MTA Repair HP, while the lowest microleakage value was observed chitosan with Biodentine group. Chitosan and phytic acid solutions can be recommended as an alternative irrigation solution to 17% EDTA in single-session apexification treatment, since they are non-toxic, naturally occurring materials, effectively remove the smear layer, and have a positive effect on bond strength and apical leakage.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Project Fund Sivas Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit; [D_IS-2021-283]
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Project Fund Sivas Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Grant/Award Number: D_IS-2021-283.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jemt.24589
dc.identifier.endpage2081
dc.identifier.issn1059-910X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0029
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.pmid38661299
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191338364
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2072
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24589
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/28646
dc.identifier.volume87
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001207824800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofMicroscopy Research and Technique
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectchitosan
dc.subjectEDTA
dc.subjectmicroleakage
dc.subjectphytic acid
dc.subjectpush-out bond strength
dc.titleComparison of push-out bond strength and apical microleakage of different calcium silicate-based cements after using EDTA, chitosan and phytic acid irrigations
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar