Recovery time variation during sprint interval training impacts amateur soccer players adaptations-a pilot study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoriddarendeli, abdulkerim/0000-0002-4581-5567
dc.authoridOzkamci, Huseyin/0000-0003-3372-2299
dc.contributor.authorDiker, Gürkan
dc.contributor.authorDarendeli, Abdulkerim
dc.contributor.authorChamari, Karim
dc.contributor.authorDellal, Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorMuniroglu, Sürhat
dc.contributor.authorOn, Sadi
dc.contributor.authorOzkamci, Huseyin
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T18:11:18Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T18:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the present study was to investigate the selected performance adaptations of amateur soccer players to 2 different running-based sprint interval training (SIT) protocols with different recovery intervals and work-rest ratios (1:5 & 1:1). Twenty-three subjects (age 21.4 +/- 1.1 years; height 175.4 +/- 4.7 cm; body mass 69 +/- 6.4 kg) participated in the study. Before the 6-weeks training period, participants completed 3-weeks of low-intensity training preparation. Subsequently, the pre-tests (anthropometric measurements, repeated sprint test [12 x 20-m with 30-s recovery intervals], Yo-YoIRT1 & Yo-YoIRT2 and treadmill VO2max test) were conducted. Thereafter, participants were randomly divided into 3 sub-groups (1 - SIT with 150 s recovery intervals [SIT150, n = 8]; 2 - SIT with 30 s recovery intervals [SIT30, n = 7]; and 3 - control group [CG, n = 8]). SIT150 and SIT30 training groups completed sprint interval training (2-days/week; 30-s all-out running, 6-10 repetition with 150 s recovery intervals for SIT150 and 30 s for SIT30 groups, respectively), a soccer match (1-day) and routine soccer training (3-days) per week. The CG attended only routine training sessions and the soccer-match (4-days). The study experiments and the trainings were conducted during off-season. Yo-YoIRT1, Yo-YoIRT2, and VO2max were significantly improved both in SIT30 and SIT150 (p < 0.05) groups. Yo-YoIRT1 and VO2max were also significantly improved in CG (p < 0.05). Both the SIT150 and SIT30 training were shown to improve Yo-YoIRT1, Yo-YoIRT2 and VO2max performance compared to the control group, nevertheless, SIT150 was more efficient in improving the Yo-YoIRT1, Yo-YoIRT2 than SIT30. The authors of this study suggest using SIT150 to induce more effective performance outputs in amateur soccer players.
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/biolsport.2023.116008
dc.identifier.endpage424
dc.identifier.issn0860-021X
dc.identifier.issn2083-1862
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid37077796
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85156089920
dc.identifier.startpage417
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.116008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/30606
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000972527400010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBiology of Sport
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectFootball
dc.subjectMaximal oxygen capacity
dc.subjectEndurance
dc.subjectExercise testing
dc.subjectGraded treadmill test
dc.titleRecovery time variation during sprint interval training impacts amateur soccer players adaptations-a pilot study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu