SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT CALCIUM SILICATE BASED CEMENTS TO COMPOSITE AND COMPOMER

dc.authoridOZNURHAN, Fatih/0000-0002-7797-0932
dc.contributor.authorOznurhan, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorAltinay, Fatma Kubra
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-04T16:45:34Z
dc.date.available2025-05-04T16:45:34Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: Shear bond strength (SBS) of different calcium silicate cements (CSC) with different adhesive systems and restoratives was evaluated., Materials and methods: NeoMTA2, NeoPutty and TheraCalPT were used as CSC.120 acrylic blocks with a hole in the middle were prepared and divided into three groups (n=40) depending on the CSC used. CSCs were placed in the prepared cavities. All groups were divided into two subgroups and adhesives (Prime&BondNT) and Universal adhesive (Scotchbond) were applied. Then, composite (n=10) and compomer (n=10) were applied and polymerized. The prepared samples were kept at 37oC in a 100% humid environment for 24 hours and SBS tests was performed with an universal testing device. Fracture types were evaluated with SEM and stereomicroscope. Results: TheraCalPT had statistically significant increased SBS values when compared to other materials(p<0.05). On the other hand, SBS values of NeoMTA and NeoPutty were insignificant(p>0.05). The difference between the adhesive systems and the restorative materials themselves was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: The ease of use of TheraCal PT and its strong bonding ability with resin restorative materials may provide support for the idea that it is suitable for pulp therapies. However, since in vitro environmental conditions do not reflect intraoral conditions, it must be supported by clinical studies to understand the actual performance and clinical usability.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Project Fund Cumhuriyet University [DIdot;Scedil;-2022-286]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund Cumhuriyet University (Grant number D & Idot;& Scedil;-2022-286) .
dc.identifier.doi10.69601/meandrosmdj.1562662
dc.identifier.endpage350
dc.identifier.issn2149-9063
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage337
dc.identifier.trdizinid1287201
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1562662
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1287201
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12418/35111
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001385863800001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofMeandros Medical and Dental Journal
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250504
dc.subjectNeoMTA
dc.subjectNeoPutty
dc.subjectTheraCal PT
dc.subjectcomposite
dc.subjectcompomer
dc.subjectshear bond strength
dc.titleSHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT CALCIUM SILICATE BASED CEMENTS TO COMPOSITE AND COMPOMER
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar